Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
1.
J Intensive Care ; 11(1): 17, 2023 May 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2320263

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Increased estimated whole blood viscosity (eWBV) predicts higher mortality in patients hospitalized for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). This study assesses whether eWBV is an early predictor of non-fatal outcomes among patients hospitalized for acute COVID-19 infection. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included 9278 hospitalized COVID-19 patients diagnosed within 48 h of admission between February 27, 2020 to November 20, 2021 within the Mount Sinai Health System in New York City. Patients with missing values for major covariates, discharge information, and those who failed to meet the criteria for the non-Newtonian blood model were excluded. 5621 participants were included in the main analysis. Additional analyses were performed separately for 4352 participants who had measurements of white blood cell count, C-reactive protein and D-dimer. Participants were divided into quartiles based on estimated high-shear blood viscosity (eHSBV) and estimated low-shear blood viscosity (eLSBV). Blood viscosity was calculated using the Walburn-Schneck model. The primary outcome was evaluated as an ordinal scale indicating the number of days free of respiratory organ support through day 21, and those who died in-hospital were assigned a value of -1. Multivariate cumulative logistic regression was conducted to evaluate the association between quartiles of eWBV and events. RESULTS: Among 5621 participants, 3459 (61.5%) were male with mean age of 63.2 (SD 17.1) years. The linear modeling yielded an adjusted odds ratio (aOR) of 0.68 (95% CI 0.59-0.79, p value < 0.001) per 1 centipoise increase in eHSBV. CONCLUSIONS: Among hospitalized patients with COVID-19, elevated eHSBV and eLSBV at presentation were associated with an increased need for respiratory organ support at 21 days. These findings are highly relevant, as they demonstrate the utility of eWBV in identifying hospitalized patients with acute COVID-19 infection at increased risk for non-fatal outcomes in early stages of the disease.

2.
Clin Hemorheol Microcirc ; 82(2): 149-155, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2280785

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Elevated estimated blood viscosity (EBV), derived from hematocrit and globulins, is associated with thrombotic complications, organ failure, and higher mortality in COVID-19 patients. Although informative, EBV does not account for cellular interactions or fibrinogen. OBJECTIVE: Investigate whether patients with acute and recent COVID-19 have altered whole blood viscosity (WBV) when measured at both high and low shear rates using in vitro blood samples from patients. METHODS: Cross-sectional study of 58 patients: 15 in the intensive care unit with acute COVID-19, 32 convalescent (9 < 8weeks [W] from acute infection, 23 > 8 W), and 11 controls without COVID-19. WBV was measured at high (300 s-1) and low (5 s-1) shear rates (HSR, LSR) using a scanning capillary viscometer.RESULTSAcute and convalescent patients < 8 W had mean WBV at LSR (16.0 centipoise [cP] and 15.1 cP) and HSR (5.1 cP and 4.7 cP). Mean WBV of convalescent > 8 W and control patients were 12.3 cP and 13.0 cP at LSR, and 4.1 cP and 4.2 cP at HSR. Acute and < 8 W patients had significantly higher WBV at both HSR and LSR compared to patients > 8 W (all p≤0.01). No significant differences in WBV were observed between acute and < 8 W patients, or between patients > 8 W and controls. CONCLUSIONS: Hyperviscosity provides a possible explanation for thrombotic risk in acute and convalescent (< 8 W) patients. These findings have important implications for thromboprophylaxis.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Thrombophilia , Thrombosis , Venous Thromboembolism , Humans , Cross-Sectional Studies , Anticoagulants , Venous Thromboembolism/complications , Blood Viscosity , Thrombosis/etiology
3.
J Am Coll Cardiol ; 80(4): 316-328, 2022 07 26.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1930910

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) is characterized by a dysfunctional immune response and abnormal blood rheology that contribute to endothelial dysfunction and thrombotic complications. Whole blood viscosity (WBV) is a clinically validated measure of blood rheology and an established predictor of cardiovascular risk. We hypothesize that increased WBV is associated with mortality among patients hospitalized with COVID-19. OBJECTIVES: This study sought to determine the association between estimated BV (eBV) and mortality among hospitalized COVID-19 patients. METHODS: The study population included 5,621 hospitalized COVID-19 patients at the Mount Sinai Health System from February 27, 2020, to November 27, 2021. eBV was calculated using the Walburn-Schneck model. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards models were used to evaluate the association between eBV and mortality. Considered covariates included age, sex, race, cardiovascular and metabolic comorbidities, in-house pharmacotherapy, and baseline inflammatory biomarkers. RESULTS: Estimated high-shear BV (eHSBV) and estimated low-shear BV were associated with increased in-hospital mortality. One-centipoise increases in eHSBV and estimated low-shear BV were associated with a 36.0% and 7.0% increase in death, respectively (P < 0.001). Compared with participants in the lowest quartile of eHSBV, those in the highest quartile of eHSBV had higher mortality (adjusted HR: 1.53; 95% CI: 1.27-1.84). The association was consistent among multiple subgroups, notably among patients without any comorbidities (adjusted HR: 1.69; 95% CI: 1.28-2.22). CONCLUSIONS: Among hospitalized COVID-19 patients, increased eBV is significantly associated with higher mortality. This suggests that eBV can prognosticate patient outcomes in earlier stages of COVID-19, and that future therapeutics aimed at reducing WBV should be evaluated.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Blood Viscosity/physiology , Comorbidity , Hospital Mortality , Hospitalization , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL